Bluetti Apex 300 vs Oukitel P2001
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Oukitel P2001 costs $700 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Bluetti Apex 300 holds 38% more energy (2764Wh vs 2000Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Bluetti Apex 300 has 3680W more surge headroom (7680W vs 4000W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Oukitel P2001 is 30.4 lb lighter (49 lb vs 79.4 lb).
- Bluetti Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 3,500 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Bluetti Apex 300
6000 cycles at 2764Wh — the best long-term cost-per-kWh in this list if you cycle daily. Bluetti's answer to the Elite 200 V2 at scale.
Best for: Off-grid solar setups where daily cycling makes lifespan the dominant cost.
Where it falls short:
- 79.4 lb
- Newer product with limited long-term field data
Oukitel P2001
An older Oukitel 2kWh, still sold cheap. Solid on paper with 2,000W and expandability, but the 500W solar input is a real limit off-grid.
Best for: Budget buyers who recharge mainly from the wall, not panels.
Where it falls short:
- 500W solar input is low for 2kWh
- Smaller support network
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Oukitel P2001 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1599 | $899 |
| Capacity | 2764 Wh | 2000 Wh |
| Continuous output | 3840 W | 2000 W |
| Surge output | 7680 W | 4000 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 6,000 | 3,500 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 79.4 lb | 49 lb |
| Max solar | 2600 W | 500 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Bluetti Apex 300 | Oukitel P2001 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 39.2 hrs | 28.3 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 74.6 hrs | 54.0 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 29.4 hrs | 21.3 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 58.7 hrs | 42.5 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.9 hrs | 2.1 hrs |