Bluetti Apex 300 vs Mango Power E
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Bluetti Apex 300 costs $1400 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Mango Power E holds 28% more energy (3533Wh vs 2764Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Bluetti Apex 300 has 1680W more surge headroom (7680W vs 6000W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Mango Power E is 6.3 lb lighter (73.1 lb vs 79.4 lb).
- Bluetti Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 3,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Bluetti Apex 300
6000 cycles at 2764Wh — the best long-term cost-per-kWh in this list if you cycle daily. Bluetti's answer to the Elite 200 V2 at scale.
Best for: Off-grid solar setups where daily cycling makes lifespan the dominant cost.
Where it falls short:
- 79.4 lb
- Newer product with limited long-term field data
Mango Power E
A polished 3.5kWh home unit with a standout 10-year warranty. The catch is a relatively low 660W solar input for the capacity.
Best for: Home-backup buyers who want a long warranty and lots of capacity.
Where it falls short:
- 660W solar input is low for 3.5kWh
- 73.1 lb
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Mango Power E |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1599 | $2999 |
| Capacity | 2764 Wh | 3533 Wh |
| Continuous output | 3840 W | 3000 W |
| Surge output | 7680 W | 6000 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 6,000 | 3,000 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 79.4 lb | 73.1 lb |
| Max solar | 2600 W | 660 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Bluetti Apex 300 | Mango Power E |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 39.2 hrs | 50.1 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 74.6 hrs | 95.3 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 29.4 hrs | 37.5 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 58.7 hrs | 75.1 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.9 hrs | 3.8 hrs |