Bluetti Apex 300 vs Anker SOLIX F2600
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker SOLIX F2600 costs $100 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Bluetti Apex 300 holds 8% more energy (2764Wh vs 2560Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Bluetti Apex 300 has 4880W more surge headroom (7680W vs 2800W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker SOLIX F2600 is 17.7 lb lighter (61.7 lb vs 79.4 lb).
- Bluetti Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 4,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
6000 cycles at 2764Wh — the best long-term cost-per-kWh in this list if you cycle daily. Bluetti's answer to the Elite 200 V2 at scale.
Best for: Off-grid solar setups where daily cycling makes lifespan the dominant cost.
Where it falls short:
- 79.4 lb
- Newer product with limited long-term field data
An odd spec sheet: 2560Wh of capacity but only 2800W surge — the lowest surge-to-capacity ratio here. Capacity without starting power.
Best for: Long-duration backup of steady loads (lights, electronics, CPAP) rather than motor-driven appliances.
Where it falls short:
- 2800W surge is barely above its 2400W continuous — it will struggle with pumps
- 61.7 lb
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX F2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1599 | $1499 |
| Capacity | 2764 Wh | 2560 Wh |
| Continuous output | 3840 W | 2400 W |
| Surge output | 7680 W | 2800 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 6,000 | 4,000 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 79.4 lb | 61.7 lb |
| Max solar | 2600 W | 1000 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Bluetti Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX F2600 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 39.2 hrs | 36.3 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 74.6 hrs | 69.1 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 29.4 hrs | 27.2 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 58.7 hrs | 54.4 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.9 hrs | ❌ |