Bluetti Apex 300 vs Anker SOLIX C300
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker SOLIX C300 costs $1420 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Bluetti Apex 300 holds 860% more energy (2764Wh vs 288Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Bluetti Apex 300 has 7080W more surge headroom (7680W vs 600W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker SOLIX C300 is 70.8 lb lighter (8.6 lb vs 79.4 lb).
- Bluetti Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 3,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Bluetti Apex 300
6000 cycles at 2764Wh — the best long-term cost-per-kWh in this list if you cycle daily. Bluetti's answer to the Elite 200 V2 at scale.
Best for: Off-grid solar setups where daily cycling makes lifespan the dominant cost.
Where it falls short:
- 79.4 lb
- Newer product with limited long-term field data
Anker SOLIX C300
Anker's smallest. 288Wh at $179 with three USB-C ports — aimed squarely at people charging modern devices, not running appliances.
Best for: Content creators and travelers with a bag full of USB-C gear.
Where it falls short:
- 300W output is device-only territory
- 100W solar input
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX C300 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1599 | $179 |
| Capacity | 2764 Wh | 288 Wh |
| Continuous output | 3840 W | 300 W |
| Surge output | 7680 W | 600 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 6,000 | 3,000 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 79.4 lb | 8.6 lb |
| Max solar | 2600 W | 100 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Bluetti Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX C300 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 39.2 hrs | ❌ |
| Mini fridge | 74.6 hrs | 7.8 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 29.4 hrs | ❌ |
| CPAP machine | 58.7 hrs | 6.1 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.9 hrs | ❌ |