Anker SOLIX C300 vs Oukitel P2001
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker SOLIX C300 costs $720 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Oukitel P2001 holds 594% more energy (2000Wh vs 288Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Oukitel P2001 has 3400W more surge headroom (4000W vs 600W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker SOLIX C300 is 40.4 lb lighter (8.6 lb vs 49 lb).
- Oukitel P2001 is rated for 3,500 cycles vs 3,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Anker SOLIX C300
Anker's smallest. 288Wh at $179 with three USB-C ports — aimed squarely at people charging modern devices, not running appliances.
Best for: Content creators and travelers with a bag full of USB-C gear.
Where it falls short:
- 300W output is device-only territory
- 100W solar input
Oukitel P2001
An older Oukitel 2kWh, still sold cheap. Solid on paper with 2,000W and expandability, but the 500W solar input is a real limit off-grid.
Best for: Budget buyers who recharge mainly from the wall, not panels.
Where it falls short:
- 500W solar input is low for 2kWh
- Smaller support network
| Spec | Anker SOLIX C300 | Oukitel P2001 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $179 | $899 |
| Capacity | 288 Wh | 2000 Wh |
| Continuous output | 300 W | 2000 W |
| Surge output | 600 W | 4000 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 3,000 | 3,500 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 8.6 lb | 49 lb |
| Max solar | 100 W | 500 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Anker SOLIX C300 | Oukitel P2001 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | ❌ | 28.3 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 7.8 hrs | 54.0 hrs |
| Chest freezer | ❌ | 21.3 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 6.1 hrs | 42.5 hrs |
| Sump pump | ❌ | 2.1 hrs |