VerifiedWatts

Anker 757 PowerHouse vs Ampace Andes 1500

Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.

Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated

The short answer

These two cost the same, so the decision comes down to what you're powering.

⚠️ Before you buy

We'd skip the Anker 757 PowerHouse in this matchup. It costs $0 more than the Ampace Andes 1500 while matching or trailing it on capacity, surge and cycle life — there's no spec here that justifies the premium.

Anker 757 PowerHouse

Anker's older flagship, now a discount play. Solid and durable, but heavy for its capacity and outclassed on charge speed by the newer C-series.

Best for: Buyers who find it discounted below the newer Anker C1000.

Where it falls short:

  • 43.9 lb for 1.2kWh is heavy
  • 300W solar input is low
  • Outclassed by the newer C1000
Ampace Andes 1500

Backed by an Amperex/CATL cell pedigree, the Andes 1500 stands out on charge speed — 0-80% in well under an hour — and a light 36.8 lb for 1.5kWh.

Best for: Buyers who prize fast charging and low weight at 1.5kWh.

Where it falls short:

  • Newer brand with a thinner track record
  • Not expandable
SpecAnker 757 PowerHouseAmpace Andes 1500
Price $999 $999
Capacity 1229 Wh 1462 Wh
Continuous output 1500 W 2000 W
Surge output 2400 W 3600 W
Battery LiFePO4 LiFePO4
Rated cycles 3,000 3,000
Weight (lighter wins) 43.9 lb 36.8 lb
Max solar 300 W 1000 W
Recharge time (faster wins) 1h 30m 55 min

Runtime head-to-head

ApplianceAnker 757 PowerHouseAmpace Andes 1500
Refrigerator17.4 hrs20.7 hrs
Mini fridge33.2 hrs39.5 hrs
Chest freezer13.1 hrs15.5 hrs
CPAP machine26.1 hrs31.1 hrs
Sump pump1.6 hrs
Anker 757 PowerHouse
Price →
Ampace Andes 1500
Price →