UGREEN PowerRoam 2000 vs Anker 757 PowerHouse
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker 757 PowerHouse costs $300 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- UGREEN PowerRoam 2000 holds 67% more energy (2048Wh vs 1229Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- UGREEN PowerRoam 2000 has 1200W more surge headroom (3600W vs 2400W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker 757 PowerHouse is 11.1 lb lighter (43.9 lb vs 55 lb).
UGREEN PowerRoam 2000
UGREEN's 2kWh option covers full-day home backup at a competitive price, though it isn't expandable like the majors' modular systems.
Best for: Buyers who want a self-contained 2kWh backup without building a modular system.
Where it falls short:
- 55 lb
- Not expandable
Anker 757 PowerHouse
Anker's older flagship, now a discount play. Solid and durable, but heavy for its capacity and outclassed on charge speed by the newer C-series.
Best for: Buyers who find it discounted below the newer Anker C1000.
Where it falls short:
- 43.9 lb for 1.2kWh is heavy
- 300W solar input is low
- Outclassed by the newer C1000
| Spec | UGREEN PowerRoam 2000 | Anker 757 PowerHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1299 | $999 |
| Capacity | 2048 Wh | 1229 Wh |
| Continuous output | 2400 W | 1500 W |
| Surge output | 3600 W | 2400 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 3,000 | 3,000 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 55 lb | 43.9 lb |
| Max solar | 1000 W | 300 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | UGREEN PowerRoam 2000 | Anker 757 PowerHouse |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 29.0 hrs | 17.4 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 55.3 hrs | 33.2 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 21.8 hrs | 13.1 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 43.5 hrs | 26.1 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.2 hrs | ❌ |