VerifiedWatts

Goal Zero Yeti 3000X vs Ampace Andes 1500

Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.

Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated

The short answer

Ampace Andes 1500 costs $2200 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.

⚠️ Before you buy

If you plan to cycle the battery daily, think twice about the Goal Zero Yeti 3000X. Its NMC cells are rated for 500 cycles against the LiFePO4 rival's longer life — over years of regular use that's the more expensive unit, whatever the sticker says.

Goal Zero Yeti 3000X

A large-capacity unit held back by aging NMC cells. The capacity is real; the cycle life and charge speed are a generation behind.

Best for: Occasional-use backup where low cycle count won't bite.

Where it falls short:

  • NMC — ~500 cycles against 4,000 for LiFePO4 rivals
  • 69.75 lb and a 4-hour recharge
  • 2-year warranty
Ampace Andes 1500

Backed by an Amperex/CATL cell pedigree, the Andes 1500 stands out on charge speed — 0-80% in well under an hour — and a light 36.8 lb for 1.5kWh.

Best for: Buyers who prize fast charging and low weight at 1.5kWh.

Where it falls short:

  • Newer brand with a thinner track record
  • Not expandable
SpecGoal Zero Yeti 3000XAmpace Andes 1500
Price $3199 $999
Capacity 3032 Wh 1462 Wh
Continuous output 2000 W 2000 W
Surge output 3500 W 3600 W
Battery NMC LiFePO4
Rated cycles 500 3,000
Weight (lighter wins) 69.75 lb 36.8 lb
Max solar 600 W 1000 W
Recharge time (faster wins) 4h 55 min

Runtime head-to-head

ApplianceGoal Zero Yeti 3000XAmpace Andes 1500
Refrigerator43.0 hrs20.7 hrs
Mini fridge81.8 hrs39.5 hrs
Chest freezer32.2 hrs15.5 hrs
CPAP machine64.4 hrs31.1 hrs
Sump pump3.2 hrs1.6 hrs
Goal Zero Yeti 3000X
Price →
Ampace Andes 1500
Price →