Bluetti Apex 300 vs Fossibot F2400
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Fossibot F2400 costs $700 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Bluetti Apex 300 holds 35% more energy (2764Wh vs 2048Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Bluetti Apex 300 has 2880W more surge headroom (7680W vs 4800W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Fossibot F2400 is 30.9 lb lighter (48.5 lb vs 79.4 lb).
- Bluetti Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 3,500 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Bluetti Apex 300
6000 cycles at 2764Wh — the best long-term cost-per-kWh in this list if you cycle daily. Bluetti's answer to the Elite 200 V2 at scale.
Best for: Off-grid solar setups where daily cycling makes lifespan the dominant cost.
Where it falls short:
- 79.4 lb
- Newer product with limited long-term field data
Fossibot F2400
A value-brand 2kWh that undercuts the majors sharply while matching them on the specs that matter — 2,400W output and a strong 4,800W surge.
Best for: Bargain hunters who want high surge and 2kWh for the least money.
Where it falls short:
- 500W solar input is low for 2kWh
- Support network trails the majors
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Fossibot F2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1599 | $899 |
| Capacity | 2764 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Continuous output | 3840 W | 2200 W |
| Surge output | 7680 W | 4800 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 6,000 | 3,500 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 79.4 lb | 48.5 lb |
| Max solar | 2600 W | 500 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Bluetti Apex 300 | Fossibot F2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 39.2 hrs | 29.0 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 74.6 hrs | 55.3 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 29.4 hrs | 21.8 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 58.7 hrs | 43.5 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.9 hrs | 2.2 hrs |