Bluetti Apex 300 vs Anker SOLIX C2000
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker SOLIX C2000 costs $300 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Bluetti Apex 300 holds 35% more energy (2764Wh vs 2048Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Bluetti Apex 300 has 4080W more surge headroom (7680W vs 3600W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker SOLIX C2000 is 30.9 lb lighter (48.5 lb vs 79.4 lb).
- Bluetti Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 3,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Bluetti Apex 300
6000 cycles at 2764Wh — the best long-term cost-per-kWh in this list if you cycle daily. Bluetti's answer to the Elite 200 V2 at scale.
Best for: Off-grid solar setups where daily cycling makes lifespan the dominant cost.
Where it falls short:
- 79.4 lb
- Newer product with limited long-term field data
Anker SOLIX C2000
2048Wh at $1299 with fast 70-minute charging. Sits between the C1000 and the F-series without a standout spec of its own.
Best for: Anker loyalists who want 2kWh and fast charging in one box.
Where it falls short:
- 3600W surge trails the DELTA 3 Max's 4800W at a higher price
- 3000 cycles vs 4000 from newer rivals
| Spec | Bluetti Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX C2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1599 | $1299 |
| Capacity | 2764 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Continuous output | 3840 W | 2400 W |
| Surge output | 7680 W | 3600 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 6,000 | 3,000 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 79.4 lb | 48.5 lb |
| Max solar | 2600 W | 1000 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h 30m | 1h 10m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Bluetti Apex 300 | Anker SOLIX C2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | 39.2 hrs | 29.0 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 74.6 hrs | 55.3 hrs |
| Chest freezer | 29.4 hrs | 21.8 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 58.7 hrs | 43.5 hrs |
| Sump pump | 2.9 hrs | 2.2 hrs |