Anker SOLIX C300 vs Pecron E3600LFP
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker SOLIX C300 costs $1520 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Pecron E3600LFP holds 942% more energy (3000Wh vs 288Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Pecron E3600LFP has 6400W more surge headroom (7000W vs 600W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker SOLIX C300 is 68.4 lb lighter (8.6 lb vs 77 lb).
- Pecron E3600LFP is rated for 3,500 cycles vs 3,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Anker SOLIX C300
Anker's smallest. 288Wh at $179 with three USB-C ports — aimed squarely at people charging modern devices, not running appliances.
Best for: Content creators and travelers with a bag full of USB-C gear.
Where it falls short:
- 300W output is device-only territory
- 100W solar input
Pecron E3600LFP
A 3kWh unit with 3,600W output and 2,500W solar input at a price well below the flagship majors — strong specs, smaller brand.
Best for: Whole-home backup buyers chasing capacity and solar input per dollar.
Where it falls short:
- 77 lb
- Brand support and resale trail the majors
| Spec | Anker SOLIX C300 | Pecron E3600LFP |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $179 | $1699 |
| Capacity | 288 Wh | 3000 Wh |
| Continuous output | 300 W | 3600 W |
| Surge output | 600 W | 7000 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 3,000 | 3,500 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 8.6 lb | 77 lb |
| Max solar | 100 W | 2500 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h | 2h |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Anker SOLIX C300 | Pecron E3600LFP |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | ❌ | 42.5 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 7.8 hrs | 81.0 hrs |
| Chest freezer | ❌ | 31.9 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 6.1 hrs | 63.8 hrs |
| Sump pump | ❌ | 3.2 hrs |