VerifiedWatts

Anker SOLIX C300 vs Goal Zero Yeti 1500

Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.

Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated

The short answer

Anker SOLIX C300 costs $1520 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.

⚠️ Before you buy

The Goal Zero Yeti 1500 is poor value on paper: 0.89 Wh per dollar versus 1.61 for the Anker SOLIX C300. Only worth it if you specifically need its higher output or 240V capability — otherwise you're paying a large premium per watt-hour.

Anker SOLIX C300

Anker's smallest. 288Wh at $179 with three USB-C ports — aimed squarely at people charging modern devices, not running appliances.

Best for: Content creators and travelers with a bag full of USB-C gear.

Where it falls short:

  • 300W output is device-only territory
  • 100W solar input
Goal Zero Yeti 1500

The new-for-2026 LiFePO4 Yeti 1500 — a big durability and cycle-life upgrade over the older 1500X it replaces.

Best for: Home backup buyers who want Goal Zero's build with modern battery chemistry.

Where it falls short:

  • 52.75 lb — a two-hand lift
  • 600W solar input is modest for the capacity
SpecAnker SOLIX C300Goal Zero Yeti 1500
Price $179 $1699
Capacity 288 Wh 1505 Wh
Continuous output 300 W 2000 W
Surge output 600 W 3600 W
Battery LiFePO4 LiFePO4
Rated cycles 3,000 4,000
Weight (lighter wins) 8.6 lb 52.75 lb
Max solar 100 W 600 W
Recharge time (faster wins) 1h 1h 30m

Runtime head-to-head

ApplianceAnker SOLIX C300Goal Zero Yeti 1500
Refrigerator21.3 hrs
Mini fridge7.8 hrs40.6 hrs
Chest freezer16.0 hrs
CPAP machine6.1 hrs32.0 hrs
Sump pump1.6 hrs
Anker SOLIX C300
Price →
Goal Zero Yeti 1500
Price →