Anker SOLIX C300 vs Fossibot F2400
Side-by-side on the specs that decide it — surge, capacity, runtime and price.
Both models' specs verified against manufacturer listings · Last updated
The short answer
Anker SOLIX C300 costs $720 less. Whether that gap is worth closing depends on what you need to run.
- Fossibot F2400 holds 611% more energy (2048Wh vs 288Wh), so it runs the same load proportionally longer.
- Fossibot F2400 has 4200W more surge headroom (4800W vs 600W) — that decides whether a fridge, pump or AC compressor will actually start.
- Anker SOLIX C300 is 39.9 lb lighter (8.6 lb vs 48.5 lb).
- Fossibot F2400 is rated for 3,500 cycles vs 3,000 — meaningful if you cycle it daily.
Anker SOLIX C300
Anker's smallest. 288Wh at $179 with three USB-C ports — aimed squarely at people charging modern devices, not running appliances.
Best for: Content creators and travelers with a bag full of USB-C gear.
Where it falls short:
- 300W output is device-only territory
- 100W solar input
Fossibot F2400
A value-brand 2kWh that undercuts the majors sharply while matching them on the specs that matter — 2,400W output and a strong 4,800W surge.
Best for: Bargain hunters who want high surge and 2kWh for the least money.
Where it falls short:
- 500W solar input is low for 2kWh
- Support network trails the majors
| Spec | Anker SOLIX C300 | Fossibot F2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $179 | $899 |
| Capacity | 288 Wh | 2048 Wh |
| Continuous output | 300 W | 2200 W |
| Surge output | 600 W | 4800 W |
| Battery | LiFePO4 | LiFePO4 |
| Rated cycles | 3,000 | 3,500 |
| Weight (lighter wins) | 8.6 lb | 48.5 lb |
| Max solar | 100 W | 500 W |
| Recharge time (faster wins) | 1h | 1h 30m |
Runtime head-to-head
| Appliance | Anker SOLIX C300 | Fossibot F2400 |
|---|---|---|
| Refrigerator | ❌ | 29.0 hrs |
| Mini fridge | 7.8 hrs | 55.3 hrs |
| Chest freezer | ❌ | 21.8 hrs |
| CPAP machine | 6.1 hrs | 43.5 hrs |
| Sump pump | ❌ | 2.2 hrs |